{"id":5503,"date":"2016-11-24T09:45:00","date_gmt":"2016-11-24T06:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/?p=5503"},"modified":"2023-04-10T19:53:10","modified_gmt":"2023-04-10T16:53:10","slug":"after-donald-trumps-victory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/after-donald-trumps-victory\/","title":{"rendered":"After Donald Trump\u2019s Victory"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>After Donald Trump\u2019s Victory &nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>nothing will be the same, especially for researchers and pollsters, whose predictions of the election results were phenomenally off the mark, including the renowned www. fivethirtyeight.com\u2019s political forecast headed by Nate Silver, the author of the book \u201cThe Noise and the Signal\u201d. &nbsp;Silver is famous for the fact that his computer evidently has no \u201cbackspace\u201d button; as he doesn\u2019t make mistakes ever\u2019\u2019. &nbsp;These recent elections indeed proved that &nbsp;the Silver\u2019s &nbsp;\u2018 good old \u2018 &nbsp;interview methods cannot be trusted when it comes to predicting voting behavior and consequently we should see a move towards online research as well as Artificial Intelligence and Social Media Listening; indeed one of the &nbsp;few companies which correctly predicted the Trump victory was the Indian startup Genic.ai. Its founder, Sanjiv Rai, has taken 20 million data points (considerably a larger sample than any other political tracker survey) from public platforms such as Google, Facebook and Twitter and analyzed the data to create predictions that were initially not taken seriously by the mainstream media. &nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full is-resized\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/after_donald_trump__website_1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-5504\" width=\"418\" height=\"283\"\/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><br>That is partly because the mainstream media did not take Donald Trump himself seriously to begin with. &nbsp; Mr. Trump is the first presidential candidate to rely heavily (almost solely) on establishing a direct relationship with the voters through his celebrity status and \u2018twitter\u2019 &nbsp;account. In Mr. Trump\u2019s case, it got a little too personal towards the end, his campaign manager had to ban him from using his own account. &nbsp;One has to admit that Clinton\u2019s \u2018Fact Checking Website\u2019 looked somewhat outdated and terribly nineteen nineties compared with Trump\u2019s juicy tweets. Meanwhile, Mr. Trump\u2019s sensational comments ensured that he never lacked for mainstream coverage; he did not have to spend a lot of money on media before the Primaries; &nbsp;thanks to his comments being inflammatory or grossly \u2018unqualified\u2018 and terribly &nbsp;\u2018un-presidential\u2019 . &nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<br>But long gone are the days when political experience and technical expertise were respected. Technocracy is indeed not held in high regard by mainstream voters, who, far&nbsp;<br>from respecting expert opinion, have come to loath it. After all, it is thanks to the \u2018 global technocrats \u2018 that the American middle class has been suffering from rising income inequality and has been left more vulnerable than ever in the face of new streamlined industrial processes and increasing competition from emerging economies. &nbsp;In the upcoming Trump era, meritocracy, expertise and technocracy may well be replaced by, \u2018anti \u2013 establishment anger\u2019, \u2018straight talk\u2019 and \u2018impulsiveness\u2019 &nbsp;\u2019 . &nbsp;As the election results indicate, voters will favor leaders who stimulate and provide easy solution to their fears, and who seem uncalculated rather than being \u2018politically correct\u2019; such are the voters who turned against Clinton in places like Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, states which have a long history of supporting the Democratic Party. &nbsp; Clinton, a technocratic establishment figure failed to connect with voters on an emotional level and could not quite develop a narrative about how she would address the country\u2019s problems. Nor did she ever take the time to visit any of these \u201crust-belt\u201d states during her presidential campaign. Trump on the other hand, strangely managed to emphasize with the daily struggles of non-collage educated, blue collar workers, despite being a billionaire.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"314\" height=\"206\" src=\"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/after_donald_trump__website_3.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-5506\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/after_donald_trump__website_3.png 314w, https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/after_donald_trump__website_3-300x197.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 314px) 100vw, 314px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><br>&nbsp;<br>Now looking back, it all looks very predictable, doesn\u2019t it? &nbsp;But the real challenge for us market researchers was to do so before the election and not afterwards. With Donald Trump as President, we are entering an era where it will be harder to predict voting behavior or influence it; and as a sector we should learn from experience, invest more in online research, Social Media Listening and develop better ways of measuring digital engagement. We should not cling to familiar old methodologies, or find peace in the comfort of technical knowledge (just look at Clinton!) and keep developing our research tools to gain understanding and insights about the public. &nbsp;Oh, and possibly tweet a bit more!&nbsp;<br>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After Donald Trump\u2019s Victory &nbsp; nothing will be the same, especially for researchers and pollsters, whose predictions of the election results were phenomenally off the mark, including the renowned www. fivethirtyeight.com\u2019s political forecast headed by Nate Silver, the author of the book \u201cThe Noise and the Signal\u201d. &nbsp;Silver is famous for the fact that his [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7971,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[157],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5503","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5503","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5503"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5503\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7971"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5503"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5503"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.xsights.co.uk\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5503"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}